I Take Care of My Mother. Can I Legally Get Paid for That?

As the number of family members providing care for aging parents increases, the solutions to find help with loss of income because of time off from employment for caregiving has become a major concern for many. The demands on both the time and energy needed to provide the needed care can make it impossible to maintain both a full time job with full time caregiving.

Angela is a registered nurse. Her mother, Renee, has been experiencing a gradual decline in her health due to her Alzheimer’s and stroke and recently moved in with Angela. Angela is taking more and more time off from work to give Renee the care she needs. Sometimes she misses out on important overtime that her household finances depend on. Angela started paying herself out of her mother’s account for the care that she gives Renee. She pays herself some weeks, and doesn’t on others, even though she is providing the same care.

It is understandable that Angela would want to be paid for the care she is giving her mother, especially when it is interfering with her current job. Also if it wasn’t for this care, Renee would be in a nursing home. But, Angela must be sure to go about getting paid correctly.

The National Family Caregiver Support Program was created by the federal government to support family caregivers. While reviewing this site, Angela found out where she can get respite care for Renee, so she can take a much needed vacation with her husband. She also discovered how she may get paid, without feeling bad about her mother’s dwindling funds, and how these payments can continue after her mother runs out of money.

Often overlooked, the Veteran’s Aid and Attendance pension benefit is a great source of money to pay family caregivers to provide care at home. This money is available to veterans who served during a period of war. Pension money is also available to the widows of these veterans. This benefit, under the right circumstances, can provide up to $1,949 a month in additional income to pay family members to provide care at home. Luckily, Angela’s late husband was a WWII veteran and she qualifies for aid. However, she must have a professionally drafted caregiver contract in place, get a medical evaluation, meet income and asset qualifications, and have proof of medical expenses and care needed.  

Alternatively, or sometimes in addition to, a long term care insurance policy covers home care and payment to the care giver from this source could be arranged. Some policies require the care provider to be through a licensed home care agency, but others will pay for individual aides certified as such. This would require some training by the family member to become certified, unless they had a nursing background, like Angela. Renee did not have a long term care insurance policy in place. However, there are policies that pay a daily benefit amount to the insured to use as they want to pay for their care.

In some cases the elder has the funds to pay for their own care. If a family member is giving care it is very important that a professionally drafted caregiver contract be in place. Without one, any payments could disqualify the elder from certain MassHealth/Medicaid long-term care payments. Lump sum payments for care and/or retroactive payments are never a good idea.

A caregiver contract prepared by an elder law attorney like Attorney Kristina R. Vickstrom, will be a signed and dated agreement will outline the services provided as well as the amount of pay for these services. The contract will eliminate questions about what is expected from both parent and caregiver as well as providing a legitimate contract and a clear and consistent payment record of services to qualify for MassHealth/Medicaid. The contact will be treated as an employer/employee relationship and payroll records must be kept with taxes paid. Retroactive payments for care-giving are almost never allowed when applying for MassHealth/Medicaid.

The family member providing such care, like Angela, can not only save their loved one from needing nursing home services outside of the home, but also could protect assets in the event that long-term care is needed in the future. Please contact Vickstrom Law to set up a consultation if you are interested in learning more about the right way to get paid to take care of your loved one.

Applying for MassHealth: Is the No-Cost Solution Really “No-Cost”?

Medicaid, or MassHealth as it is referred to in Massachusetts, is an avenue available for funding long-term nursing home care. To qualify, you must meet asset thresholds that many elders exceed. Additionally there are income requirements for MassHealth/Mediciad. Adequate understanding of MassHealth/Medicaid law and proper strategizing is a critical component of any plan for the future. With the proper planning of an elder-law attorney, you can protect your property, spouse, and assets.

After attempting to cope with his mother’s diagnosis of dementia for several months, Joe has finally decided to research local nursing homes for his mother. However, he is concerned about the cost while protecting his mother’s multiple properties, which have been in the family for generations. During a vist, Lindsay, a social worker from the facility, reached out to Joe, offering to complete a MassHealth application for his mother at no-cost. While Joe likes the concept of this free service, he can’t help but wonder if there is a catch involved.

Employed by the nursing home, social workers and other nursing home advocates focus on the rights of the nursing home and not the resident. The nursing home has a vested interest in keeping someone on “private-pay” for as long as possible because their private pay-rates are much higher than the amount received in MassHealth/Medicaid reimbursement. This means more out-of-pocket costs for residents than may be necessary.

Further, even if nursing home advocates do have the best of intentions, the MassHealth/Medicaid process is riddled with complex rules and regulations that are difficult to navigate for those not educated in the eligibility requirements and advantageous planning opportunities available under MassHealth/Medicaid. For instance, an individual encouraged to apply too soon might be ineligible for an extended time period and have to pay privately for a longer duration. Alternatively, the “advocate” may not inform the family that they can pre-pay for funeral expenses as part of a spend down, thereby reducing the burden on family members when the applicant passes.

Individuals that enlist family members to fill out their MassHealth applications or file themselves may face similar problems. Unfamiliar with eligibility requirements and liable to miss prime planning opportunities, these individuals are likely to encounter harsh penalties or confusion when faced with the application process, as well as income and asset verifications. Once they receive their denial notice in the mail, it will be much more expensive to get an Elder Law attorney involved at that point. Additionally there are strict time periods that must be adhered to in order to have any change at being sucessful in a MassHealth/Medicaid appeal.

Nursing home advocates and family members, although the cheapest solution up front, do not have the requisite knowledge, skills, or ability to compose trusts, devise appropriate estate plans, and represent you in an appeal setting if the need should arise. Rectifying the mistakes of an advocate or self-handled application may be more costly than a properly executed plan formulated a skilled elder law attorney. By hiring an elder law attorney to guide the MassHealth application process, you will ensure that your savings, your spousal support, and your family’s inheritance will not be jeopardized by lost opportunities in a last minute planning strategy.

Hiring a lawyer to handle your MassHealth application is a necessary investment. Elder law attorneys can save clients and their family members an amount greater than the cost of their legal services. If you are interested in learning more about the MassHealth application process or long-term care planning, contact Vickstrom Law today!

What Do You Mean Medicare Won’t Pay for Dad’s Nursing Home Stay?!

A three-day hospitalization often serves as a gateway for a senior citizen’s transition into a skilled care facility. When the patient is discharged to a skilled care facility for occupational, physical, or speech therapy, the patient’s health insurance (Medicare) will continue to finance treatment for up to 100 days per stay (as long as the person continues to benefit from rehab). Medicare coverage ultimately ends, and when it does, the patient must pay from income, savings, long-term care insurance, Medicaid, or a combination of these resources.

Jo-Ann’s ninety year-old father, Ed, recently suffered a massive stroke. After spending four days in the hospital, Ed was transferred to the Odd Fellows Home in Worcester, Massachusetts for round the clock skilled care. Medicare covered the entirety of Ed’s expenses for the first 20 days of his stay, and Ed fronted a $95 copayment for days 21-100. It is now day 101. Medicare refuses to pay for Ed’s care because the program contends coverage has ended and that Ed now must meet his skilled care expenses from another source.  Ed has been primarily dependent on monthly Social Security checks after running through his savings a few years ago. Jo-Ann is a single mother of four children who fears that she won’t be able to keep her father in a nursing home due to her financial inabilities and his exhausted savings. She thought that since Ed paid taxes his whole life it would have guaranteed him government-funded nursing home care. What are Ed’s options?

It is easy to confuse Medicare with Medicaid. Medicare is a federal health insurance program. Anyone who has paid their taxes and meets specific qualifications (is over the age of 65, or who has been blind or disabled for the past two years) is entitled to Medicare coverage. Hospitalization, immunizations, medical equipment, and physician visits are covered by Medicare, while deductibles and co-pays are often covered by a form of supplemental policy. Medicare applies regardless of financial need but will not pay for nursing home care except in extremely limited circumstances, and then only for small durations.

Ed might benefit from applying for Medicaid, or MassHealth in Massachusetts. A joint federal and state program for individuals with certain medical needs who are financially needy, Medicaid/MassHealth is often the chief financier for nursing home care. An applicant may have no more than $2000 in countable assets (cash, savings, mutual funds, retirement accounts, houses) before requesting Medicaid/MassHealth. To achieve Medicaid/MassHealth payouts, many individuals will seek to transfer their assets to loved ones to demonstrate financial need. It is important to note that the transfer of assets for less than their fair market value will result in a corresponding ineligibility period for Medicaid/MassHealth coverage of nursing home care.

The average cost of a nursing home in Massachusetts is an astounding $11,000 per month. If you or a loved one has exhausted all means of paying for skilled care, it is important to contact an Elder Law attorney to discuss your options. After recommending Medicaid/MassHealth, an Elder Law attorney may suggest ways to set aside funds and assets for your family without jeopardizing the patient’s medical care and “spend down” ideas which benefit the patient.

Medicaid/MassHealth rules are complex and confusing. Further, nothing in this area is concrete or insulated from legal or policy change. Vickstrom Law can help explain the interrelationship between Medicaid/MassHealth and nursing homes and can assist with protecting and preserving assets for a spouse or other family members.

Joint Bank Accounts for Seniors: Yay or Nay?

Many seniors currently need assistance paying their bills and managing their finances, or may need help sometime in the future.  It’s important to have a trustworthy person authorized to manage your finances should you be unable to do so yourself.  Are joint bank accounts a good option?

Here’s a common  scenario

Florence, an 86-year-old widower, decided to have her eldest daughter, Marie, listed on all her bank accounts after her husband’s passing. She needed some help getting to the bank and figured it was easier to have Marie do it for her. Sometimes, Florence needed Marie to help her write out the monthly bills because she was also starting to have memory issues.

Marie took this responsibility very seriously and made weekly trips to the bank for her mother. A few times Marie helped herself to $200 here and there, just to get her through to her next paycheck. She always put it back… except for the last three times. She just can’t seem to get caught up. Maybe Marie would be able to take on more hours at work but she is very stressed about her 16-year-old son who just severely injured someone in a car accident. She’s thinking about filing for bankruptcy to ease the financial situation.

Be sure to properly assess potential risks

For Florence, adding Marie, or another other loved one, as co-owner on bank and brokerage accounts seemed to be an easy and convenient way of managing her assets and making sure her bills are paid on time.  However, many seniors do not take into account the risks and potential consequences of joint ownership, and the alternatives that can mitigate those risks.

First,  a joint owner has complete access to your accounts and make unlimited withdrawals without your approval. Marie has been helping herself to a little bit here and little bit there for a while now. Florence never knew about it and when she did find out she didn’t ask for it back because she felt bad for Marie. Unfortunately, these were considered disqualifying transfers or “gifts” when Florence applied for MassHealth. She was denied coverage for her nursing home stay because to qualify for MassHealth (Medicaid) you can’t give gifts (or other disqualifying transfers) for five years.

Your co-signer’s liabilities could now be your responsibility

Second, a joint owner is considered owning 100% of the assets, just as you are, regardless of who contributed them in the first place. This leaves your assets vulnerable to their debts and liabilities. If Marie is sued because of her minor son’s  accident, Florence’s bank accounts are at risk. Florence’s bank accounts could also be at risk if Marie files for bankruptcy. If your co-owner goes through a divorce, has a business failure, or gets sued for any other reason, your money could also be exposed to those claims.

Your estate plan could be undermined

Third, when you die, the assets in a jointly-owned account will automatically become the property of the surviving owner.  Florence’s Will directed her estate to be split equally amongst her three children when she died. When she died she only had a few personal effects and a few bank accounts with roughly $10,000. Since Marie was listed as joint owner on all accounts, the funds became legally hers when her mother passed. She knows she has a moral obligation to follow what the Will says, but nobody can make her do it. After all, her brother hasn’t bothered to see her mother in two years and her sister is pretty well-off; she needs the money more than they do anyways. 

Protect your assets

One simple alternative is to have a Durable Power of Attorney prepared by an Elder Law Attorney. Your agent under your Power of Attorney would be able to manage your finances on your behalf, including making withdrawals and writing checks without your permission, but the assets would be owned by you alone. 

Your agent would have a legal duty to manage your finances on your behalf and in your best interest; your assets would not be subject to your agent’s liabilities; and your assets would not automatically pass to your agent upon your death.

It’s important that you speak to an Elder Law attorney about planning for a time when you may be incapable of managing your own affairs.

When it Could be OK to Give Assets Away When Planning for Long Term Care (Nursing Home)

Not long ago, I posted a blog on gift transfers and their affect on qualification for MassHealth (Medicaid) for an institutionalized individual. Generally, transferring assets to dispose of property so that you qualify for MassHealth will not actually help you qualify because the state imposes a five-year “look-back” period, in which those assets are counted and used to assess eligibility for MassHealth. Fortunately, there are some exceptions to the general rule.

Under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, an individual may still be eligible for MassHealth if certain assets were transferred to specific individuals. One of your biggest assets is probably your home. You can transfer title to your home to the following individuals without it being counted and without subjecting you to the 5-year look-back period: (1) your spouse; (2) your child who is under age 21, or is blind or permanently disabled; (3) your brother or sister who has lived with you for at least one whole year prior to the day you entered an institution and holds an equity interest in the home; or (4) your “caregiver” child.

A “caregiver” child is a son or daughter that lived with you for the two whole years prior to the date you entered an institution and provided the care you needed to remain in your home. If you were healthy enough to live in your home without your child’s help, a transfer of your home to that child will not protect you from the transfer rules. All other assets can also be transferred without being counted or subjecting you to the 5-year look-back period if they are transferred correctly and fall within the other exceptions to the general rule.

Any and all assets can be transferred to your spouse or to someone else for the sole benefit of your spouse. Your spouse may also transfer any and all of the assets to someone else for the sole benefit of your spouse. This means that someone else would hold legal title to the property, but it would only be used for the needs and wishes of your spouse.

Assets may also be transferred to your child if he or she is blind or permanently disabled. You have the option of transferring such assets directly to your child or to a trust for the sole benefit of your child. Either way, these gifts would not be subject to the new transfer rules.

Finally, you may transfer any and all of your assets to a trust for the sole benefit of any disabled person under age 65. Under this exception, a disabled individual is someone whose mental or physical impairment is so severe that he or she will be unable to perform substantial gainful work in order to provide for him or herself. This mental or physical impairment must be expected either to result in death, or to last continuously for a period of at least one year. There is no statutory requirement that you be related to this disabled individual for your transfers to fall within the exception.

While exceptions to the general rule on transfers of gifts do exist, it is very important that you speak with an attorney before making any transfers to ensure that you will still qualify for MassHealth. The 5-year look-back period is a long time to wait to be eligible for the services you need.