The late singer’s will leaves everything to her 19-year-old daughter, Bobbi Kristina, but Kristina can’t access her mother’s estimated $20 million fortune right away because it is in a trust.

According to news reports, Houston’s will sets up what is known as a “testamentary trust” for her daughter. A testamentary trust is a trust created by a will. The will names a trustee and specifies what property will be put in the trust. Such a trust has no power or effect until the will of the donor is probated (processed through the legal system). Although a testamentary trust does not avoid the need for probate and becomes a public document because it is a part of the will, it can be useful in accomplishing other estate planning goals, such as providing for a child or reducing estate taxes in certain circumstances.

The person creating the trust may want to prevent a beneficiary who is a child or young adult from inheriting a large amount of money before he or she can handle it. One option is to pay the beneficiary in stages when the beneficiary reaches a certain age or achieves a specific goal.

This is what Whitney Houston’s trust does.  It reportedly allows Houston’s daughter to receive a 10 percent payout when she turns 21, another one-sixth when she turns 25, and the remainder of the trust’s assets when she turns 30. In this type of trust, the trustee usually has the discretion to distribute trust funds to the child at any time prior to attaining these ages, if needed for education or other reasons.

Will Never Updated

Now to the surprising parts of Houston’s estate plan.  First, as Forbes magazine columnists note, Houston could have accomplished the same goals through a living trust, a type of revocable trust, which would have kept the provisions of the trust private because it would pass outside of probate. Second, Houston was relying on a will that was created in 1993, when she was married to Bobby Brown, and it apparently was never updated, even after she and Brown divorced in 2007.  The will names Brown as the suggested guardian for Bobbi Kristina.  Although Bobbi Kristina is no longer a minor, Brown could still gain control of Kristina through a Conservatorship, as was done in the case of Britney Spears.  Finally, the will provided that if Houston had no living children at the time of her death, her fortune would be split between Brown and several family members.

Perhaps all this is what Houston wanted, even after her divorce from Brown, but that should have been made clear in an updated will.  As it stands, it appears that Houston simply neglected to do something elder law attorneys urge all clients to do: update their estate plan after a divorce or other major life change.

Trusts — either testamentary or living — can be set up for many different purposes. To decide if a trust is right for you, consult an elder law attorney.

Contact Attorney Kristina Vickstrom for more information on trusts.

Photo credit: asterix611 / cc by-sa 2.0

Far too many people assume that their families would make the choices they would want in an emergency.  Yet everyday we hear stories of adult children, siblings, or other relatives/friends battling during a health care crisis over “what their loved one would have wanted” in that situation.

The Terry Schiavo case is a great example of this. At the young age of 26, Shiavo suffered sudden cardiac arrest and slipped into a permanent a vegetative state.    She never documented her wishes about things like feeding tubes, life support, and long-term quality of life, leaving her spouse and parents to battle for years over these questions in court.

Her husband eventually had her feeding tube removed claiming, “That’s what she would have wanted.”  But was it really? Her parents certainly didn’t think so. But we’ll never know because Terry didn’t make her healthcare wishes known to her closest family and friends.

But it’s not enough to just tell someone about your wishes.  You need to clearly document your preferences, too.  Remember, emotions can run high during a health care crisis, and it might be hard for your loved ones to stop life support when they desperately want you around.  Having your wishes spelled out in writing helps make these types of decisions easier for your loved ones, especially in cases when family members don’t agree.

So in honor of National Health Care Decisions Day, I encourage you to start tough conversations with loved ones about your personal medical preferences for medical and/or long-term care.  Here are some important questions to consider:

• What are your thoughts on feeding tubes, life support, and other artificial life saving devices?
• Is there any type of medical care you would NEVER want?
• If you were permanently disabled or incapacitated, what things would contribute or take away from your “quality of life?”
• Who do you trust to make important medical decisions if you are unable to speak for yourself?
• What are your thoughts on nursing home vs. in-home health care?  Who would you trust to manage your long-term care? your finances?

These are not the most fun conversations to have, but they will help to ensure that your most personal wishes are honored in a true medical emergency.  Talk them over with loved ones and have Attorney Kristina Vickstrom prepare important legal documents like a Health Care Proxy, a Living Will, and a Durable Power of Attorney. Getting documents in writing that spell out your wishes and the care you want if something happens to you is one of the best gifts you can give your family. It can avoid misunderstandings, family disagreements, and even court battles.

Get something in writing before an unforeseen emergency strikes. Do it early (age 18 and up) and check it often (with a major life event, or at least every 5 to 10 years) to make sure you have the most protection under the current Massachusetts laws and to make any changes to your wishes and/or decision makers.

Photo credit: Shoothead / cc by-nd 2.0

As an estate planning  and guardianship attorney, I recommend that all parents in Worcester who have children under 18 make planning a priority.  No one wants to consider the idea that they will not be able to raise their kids, but the unforeseen does happen.  By putting a plan into place while you are young and healthy, you can help determine your children’s future, even if you aren’t able to play the role in it that you had hoped.

For example, if you were to die or become somehow incapacitated, who would you choose to care for your child or children?  In many cases, the surviving parent is the obvious choice.  But, considering the fact that the family will be going through a particularly difficult time and that the parental responsibilities will now fall to one person, it may be beneficial to go a step further.  To do this, more central Massachusetts families are choosing to create an estate plan that provides for more financial support of both the children and the spouse.  In doing so, that caregiver can be relieved of some of the burden of working and raising the children.

In cases where both parents are killed or where one parent is already absent from the child’s life, setting up a guardianship is a must.  This allows you to determine who in your “village” will be responsible for the continued upbringing of your children.  Your estate plan may offer financial support to this person as well as trusts that the children can access when they reach a certain age.  That said, it is acceptable to place a different person than you named as guardian in charge of financial responsibilities.  An estate planning attorney will walk through the options with you in order to find a solution that best fits your situation.

When it comes to finances, it is also a good idea to consider what kinds of restrictions you might want to place on your children’s access to inheritance.  Some parents make access contingent upon certain goals such as age, education, and behavior.  Simply allowing access to a trust when a child reaches 18 may not always be the best approach due to inexperience and pressure from others.

Again, an estate planning attorney is well versed in the options available to parents who wish to plan for their minor children.  Choosing someone in the Worcester area, like Vickstrom Law, ensures that your estate plan is valid, complete, and meets the criteria of the local courts. For more information, please contact Attorney Kristina Vickstrom.

Photo Credit:  limaoscarjuliet / cc by 2.0

Not necessarily. Even if you are single and/or have no children, a Worcester Wills and Estates lawyer like Attorney Kristina Vickstrom should still be in your plans. Why? Because estate planning is really about YOU.

While it is absolutely advisable for married people or those with children to work with an estate planning lawyer, it’s also just as important for single adults. After all, when a married person suffers a major illness, it’s usually pretty clear who will eventually take on their medical and financial responsibility. The water gets murkier for unmarried individuals.

If you were to suddenly become incapacitated, who would make your medical decisions for you? Possibly your parents would be called in to determine how your medical care should proceed. It might be your sibling. But what if you don’t get along with your brother? Even if your parent or sibling would be your first choice, that doesn’t mean that the courts would agree without having your wishes legally documented.

The person to make medical and financial decision on your behalf is whomever the courts decide! Again, it could be a parent, a sibling, some other relative, or even a court-appointed individual (a stranger!). While she was not single when she was hit with dementia, the children of the late signer, Etta James, fought repeatedly with their step-father over the management of her assets and health care. James should have documented her wishes and avoided a lot of the conflict, allowing her family to more fully enjoy her last moments.

Finally, who would have legal rights to your belongings, to your home, to your pets? You may think you know the answers, but without clearly outlining your wishes with a Worcester area Wills and Trusts attorney, you have very little control over the matter. Families can be torn apart by court battles involving an estate with no Will. Popular Swedish novelist Stieg Larsson, who died unexpectedly in 2004, had been living with his girlfriend of 30 years at his passing and had taken on no estate planning. A legal battlefield erupted over his assets, namely the rights to his successful publications. With the exception of an unfinished manuscript on a shared laptop, his girlfriend walked away with nothing and Larsson’s father and brother inherited everything. This also could have been avoided, or lessened, if Larsson had set up even the most basic of estate plans.

A single adult without children does not need to worry about creating guardianships and trusts to provide for his or her children, but it’s certainly a good idea to look out for yourself. Some of the basic legal documents any single person should have include:

• A Will to determine what will become of your assets in the event of your death.
• A Health Care Proxy to name the person you want making medical decisions on your behalf.
• A Power of Attorney for financial matters to name the person you feel should be responsible for your money if you are incapacitated.
• And possibly a revocable living trust to centralize management of assets if you become incapacitated and keep your assets out of probate if you should pass away.

These documents are crucial in ensuring that your wishes are met and that you have control over your future. One doesn’t need to a famous R&B singer or best-selling, author to need an estate plan. Everyone, including single people, in Worcester County, should consider estate planning.  Contact Vickstrom Law today to set up a consultation or to find out more information.

Photo courtesy of Bree Bailey

One of the biggest factors, of course, is that most people don’t want to consider their own mortality, and estate planning forces you to do just that.  When it comes to adult children, we are just as guilty of not wanting to think about the inevitability of losing our parents, and therefore, we choose not to push them.

There are other complex reasons that come into play as well.  An adult child who wants to encourage his or her parents to set up wills and trusts may worry that the parent or other family members will mistake concern for greed.  If the parent has remarried, then even more complex family dynamics can come into play, with the adult child remaining quiet on the subject rather than creating waves.

Elder law attorneys understand these considerations and so many more, but we also know what happens when advanced planning isn’t given enough attention.  When a parent passes away or becomes incapacitated without an estate plan, the fallout can be devastating.  It may fall to the courts to determine who should be given power over medical and/or financial decisions for the parent, and the court’s opinion often does not reflect the wishes of those involved.

Really, having a plan in advance of a tragic event is the best way to ensure it will be handled according to your parents’ desires; and framing the request in this way can be helpful.  At a time in life when they are finding themselves with less and less control, it can be reassuring to know that some of the most important decisions regarding health, money, and property are theirs to make; and that when they can no longer make those decisions, substitute decision makers of their choosing are ready to step in.

In order for this to happen, though, parents need to meet with their elder law attorney while they are still able to make sound decisions and legally sign documents.  Again, most people don’t want to think about losing their mental acuity, but it can be very common.

Creating wills and trusts and setting up powers of attorney and a health care proxy can give your parent the sense of control that they may feel slipping away.  During your discussions with your parent, it can also be helpful to point out that estate planning:

• Allows them to determine who they want to have in charge of their money
• Provides the opportunity to designate who will receive which assets (or none at all)
• Keeps the courts out of the process, or limits their involvement, saving time, money, and hassle for those left behind
• Ensures that THEIR wishes are the ones that matter
• Minimizes the taxes that will be paid out of the estae

Life is busy, and it’s easy to say that estate planning is something that we’ll get to “later.”  However, “later” doesn’t always come when you think it will.  Instead of leaving the decisions (and potential hassles) in someone else’s hands, empower your parents to have a say in their future and the future of their family. Contact Vickstrom Law today for more information about encouraging your parents to handle their estate plan and to set up a consultation.

Angela is a registered nurse. Her mother, Renee, has been experiencing a gradual decline in her health due to her Alzheimer’s and stroke and recently moved in with Angela. Angela is taking more and more time off from work to give Renee the care she needs. Sometimes she misses out on important overtime that her household finances depend on. Angela started paying herself out of her mother’s account for the care that she gives Renee. She pays herself some weeks, and doesn’t on others, even though she is providing the same care.

It is understandable that Angela would want to be paid for the care she is giving her mother, especially when it is interfering with her current job. Also if it wasn’t for this care, Renee would be in a nursing home. But, Angela must be sure to go about getting paid correctly.

The National Family Caregiver Support Program was created by the federal government to support family caregivers. While reviewing this site, Angela found out where she can get respite care for Renee, so she can take a much needed vacation with her husband. She also discovered how she may get paid, without feeling bad about her mother’s dwindling funds, and how these payments can continue after her mother runs out of money.

Often overlooked, the Veteran’s Aid and Attendance pension benefit is a great source of money to pay family caregivers to provide care at home. This money is available to veterans who served during a period of war. Pension money is also available to the widows of these veterans. This benefit, under the right circumstances, can provide up to $1,949 a month in additional income to pay family members to provide care at home. Luckily, Angela’s late husband was a WWII veteran and she qualifies for aid. However, she must have a professionally drafted caregiver contract in place, get a medical evaluation, meet income and asset qualifications, and have proof of medical expenses and care needed.  

Alternatively, or sometimes in addition to, a long term care insurance policy covers home care and payment to the care giver from this source could be arranged. Some policies require the care provider to be through a licensed home care agency, but others will pay for individual aides certified as such. This would require some training by the family member to become certified, unless they had a nursing background, like Angela. Renee did not have a long term care insurance policy in place. However, there are policies that pay a daily benefit amount to the insured to use as they want to pay for their care.

In some cases the elder has the funds to pay for their own care. If a family member is giving care it is very important that a professionally drafted caregiver contract be in place. Without one, any payments could disqualify the elder from certain MassHealth/Medicaid long-term care payments. Lump sum payments for care and/or retroactive payments are never a good idea.

A caregiver contract prepared by an elder law attorney like Attorney Kristina R. Vickstrom, will be a signed and dated agreement will outline the services provided as well as the amount of pay for these services. The contract will eliminate questions about what is expected from both parent and caregiver as well as providing a legitimate contract and a clear and consistent payment record of services to qualify for MassHealth/Medicaid. The contact will be treated as an employer/employee relationship and payroll records must be kept with taxes paid. Retroactive payments for care-giving are almost never allowed when applying for MassHealth/Medicaid.

The family member providing such care, like Angela, can not only save their loved one from needing nursing home services outside of the home, but also could protect assets in the event that long-term care is needed in the future. Please contact Vickstrom Law to set up a consultation if you are interested in learning more about the right way to get paid to take care of your loved one.

After suffering ten years of domestic abuse at the hands of her husband, Jennifer finally filed for divorce and moved herself and her daughter in with her parents, Gerry and Donna Daly. Although the relocation was supposed to be temporary, Jennifer has exhausted her bank accounts, refuses to obtain employment, and has sunk into a deep depression. Gerry and Donna are proud, retired grandparents who want to ensure that their grandchild is raised with love, discipline, and opportunity. They have been expensing the household’s grocery bills and clothing for the child, as well as toting her from play-dates to extracurricular activities. The Dalys’ other children have begun to voice concern over their parents’ spending, noting that their income is supposed to sufficiently cover a two-person household and not be stretched to support a four person family. While Gerry and Donna understand their concern, they don’t believe in asking Jennifer and her daughter to leave and have the utmost confidence that Jennifer will get back on her feet. What are their legal and financial options?

Many times, the child-rearing duties that grandparents assume will cause a real strain on seniors’ budgets. Child care costs can grow exponentially dependent on the length of time a grandparent will be asked to assist in raising his or her grandchild. Given this responsibility, these seniors might consider obtaining legal authority to make decisions for that child – on important issues such as healthcare and schooling – and financial assistance from the State.

In Massachusetts alone, 67,781 children reside in grandparent-headed households. Although the Daly’s granddaughter is physically living in their home and they are raising her, Gerry and Donna do not have any legal rights or authority to make decisions on behalf of the children. Jennifer could sign a form giving her parents ‘caregiver authorization.’  This is a caretaking option provided by the Massachusetts Uniform Probate code and allows parents to authorize a designated caregiver to exercise “concurrent parental rights” on healthcare and schooling matters. Provided that the caregiver lives with the child, the authorization is valid for two years and does not require court approval. Caregiver authorization is an alternative to filing for Guardianship of a Minor, a court decree effectively suspending the rights of the parents and transferring them to a guardian entrusted with caretaking responsibility. Depending on Jennifer’s state, this may be necessary for the Dalys.

If you are on a fixed income and unable to get help from a child’s parents, the child may be eligible for payments from Massachusetts’ Transitional Aid to Families with Dependent Children and medical coverage through MassHealth. For further information on assistance through these and similar programs, consider reviewing the Massachusetts “Resource Guide for Grandparents Raising their Children.”

While it may be your desire to become legally and financially responsible for your grandchildren, you are not required to as a matter of law. It is ultimately up to the Commonwealth to assign custody to a suitable individual. However, if circumstances have placed your grandchildren in your home, it is helpful and oftentimes necessary to review your present legal options and to adapt an existing estate plan to ensure that the unique challenges of caring for grandchildren are addressed. Contact Vickstrom Law to your situation and get informed on your options.

After her husband of 49 years passed away, Louise never thought she would remarry. After six months she met Frank, a man fifteen years younger, who occasionally accompanied Louise to dinner and church. About a year and a half after her husband died, Louise called her daughter, Emily, saying she’d been scoping out wedding venues. Prior to the wedding, Emily pushed that the couple sign a prenuptial agreement. Her mother had considerable assets and she worried that Frank might be after her money. Louise brought the concerns to Frank, who balked at the idea, declaring that their marriage would endure forever. After some discussion, Louise became adamant, wanting to preserve some assets and family property for her children as a condition of the marriage. Ultimately, the prenup was a deal-breaker; Frank was either interested in little more than her wealth or was too hurt to come to turns with the reality of their relationship.

Without a prenup in place, your new spouse could invalidate your previously existing estate plan. For example, suppose Louise intended her home to pass to Emily. With improper estate planning and no prenup, Frank could inherit her house and pass it on to his heirs when he dies. Disinheriting her children would probably not have been Louse’s intention.

One common perception of a prenup is that the agreement entails fear that a marriage will fail. Why draft a prenup if two individuals love and trust one another? Frank may have had these concerns. While a premarital agreement might feel unsatisfying, over one-quarter of senior marriages do end in divorce. With accumulated resources and descendants, a prenup can ensure that a spouse’s separate assets will pass to his or her own loved ones upon marriage dissolution. Though it may not seem fitting with the romance of a wedding, think of a prenup as an open and honest disclosure of both parties’ assets and agreement as to their distribution.

A prenup is not an estate-planning tool and may not take precedence over a will or trust. The married later in life couple must also be sure to implement a solid estate plan to ensure their joint wishes are not undermined by the surviving spouse. To ensure that your prenuptial agreement is valid, it must be in writing, signed voluntarily, read and understood by both parties, disclosures must be open and honest, and the agreement must be fair and not contain illegal provisions. If you have already remarried and did not negotiate a prenuptial agreement, these issues may be resolved with a post-nuptial agreement and through proper estate planning.

Contact Vickstrom Law for more information concerning prenuptial or postnuptial agreements as well as proper estate planning for later in life marriages.

Mary lived alone on a large estate for fifteen years following her wealthy second husband’s death. Her only living relative was her sister, Louise. The two have been close since childhood, but in recent times the frailty of both women has led to fewer and fewer visits. Mary passed away in January after a three-year battle with endometrial cancer. Although weakened by age and sickness, often delusional and dependent on prescription medication, Mary executed a second version of her will in 2010 (unbeknownst to Louise) with the assistance of her live-in caregiver, Kate. When the terms of Mary’s will are administered, Louise discovers that she is to receive just $1,000 while Kate is the primary benefactor of Mary’s $450,000 estate.

Many times, the relative of one who has recently passed believes that they were unjustly left out of a will. Perhaps due to the mental state of the deceased, the relative might believe that the deceased was delusional in granting a non-relative a financial windfall. In the above example, Louise would like to know whether she has any legal recourse to challenge Kate’s award. She feels that Kate knew about Mary’s delusional capabilities and possibly took advantage of Mary in receiving the majority of Mary’s estate, and finds it hard to believe that her sister would not have left her more. However, it is also reasonable to see that Mary might have felt indebted to Kate and wanted to provide her with a genuine token of appreciation for her services.

In order to create a valid will in Massachusetts a person must possess “testamentary capacity”. In most states, this means that the person creating the will understands the nature of the document, the worth of her assets, and her relationship with whomever she is transferring them to. Testamentary capacity requires freedom from delusion which is the effect of disease or weakness and which might influence the disposition of her property. The person executing the will needs only to be aware of her actions during the period of time she is making the will. The fact that he or she doesn’t remember it the day after does not invalidate a will.

Although wills contests arise frequently, proving that a person is without testamentary capacity is difficult because signing a will does not require a great deal of coherence nor consistency. Louise would have be allowed to contest Mary’s will in the probate court, but it likely would lead to a lot of costly litigation. Most often the disagreeing parties will negotiate a settlement to mitigate the litigation.

If a relative finds themselves in a similar position, they should contact an attorney experienced in Estate Administration to discuss the possibility of a legal claim. If you considering disinheriting an heir who might attempt to challenge a will’s provisions, speak to an experienced Estate Planning attorney about avoiding the probate process altogether through the use revocable or irrevocable trust planning.

Contesting a will is a procedural and difficult process. Yet, if you feel that a loved one lacked the mental capacity to transfer his or her estate, contact our office to discuss your options.

Most everyone would say that they want to be independent and remain in their own homes as long as possible. This sense of autonomy can be kept in place longer than ever before due to medical advances, assistive devices, and in-home care provided by family members and private caretakers. However, what happens when an elder can no longer remain safely in their home and an adult child is trying to get them the help they need?

Esther is 89 years old. She has lived alone since the death of her husband 23 years ago. She gave up driving two years ago, but is regularly visited by her children and grandchildren, who take care of errands or drive her to handle things herself. Lately, she has been rather unsteady on her feet. Additionally, she has been very forgetful and once left the stove on all night. She is also having trouble remembering to take her medications. There were so many her daughter, Susan, sorts them every week into a pill box. Esther still forgets to take them and sometimes actually doubles up on doses. Susan can see its time for more help but Esther is adamant about not having strangers in the house and doesn’t want to end up in “one of those places…”

Many times, elders resent their adult children trying to help them.  In the elderly parents mind, they are still independent and completely able to handle their own affairs.  In the above example, Esther does not appreciate her daughter’s suggestion that they bring in some private home care, or that her mother visit an assisted living facility or rest home. She feels her children are being too pushy, and trying to take control.

But on the other side, Susan feels that Esther isn’t thinking clearly anymore. She is extremely hurt by her mother’s attitude and reaction. After all, Susan is just trying to help. 

The parent/child roles have been reversed, except unlike with young children, the adult child does not have the automatic right to make decisions for the elderly parent. Unless the child seeks to declare the parent incapacitated through a court ordered Guardianship or Conservatorship, or has the parent’s Health Care Proxy and/or Durable Power of Attorney activated, the child has to realize that in the eyes of the law, the parent may make their own decisions. And, unfortunately, people are allowed to make bad decisions.  However, it is important that the adult child watch the situation carefully and not get frustrated and leave the parent to their own devices.  Assisting does not mean taking over against their parent’s will. 

Too many children have simply given up when their “help” is not accepted. If one finds themselves in that situation, they can contact our office for assistance and suggestions for getting through to the parent, discussing the possible need for Guardianship, ensuring that the elder’s estate planning documents are in order, scheduling a medical evaluation, and/or perhaps referral to a geriatric care manager where appropriate.

The elderly years can be as challenging as the terrible twos, terrible terrible teens, and even the terrible twenties.  Elderly parents must be respected by the adult child who is trying to help, even if the parent/child roles have truly been reversed.