The federal law, known as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), generally prevents health care providers from disclosing your personal medical information to anyone other than you and someone you’ve named as your “personal representative.” Frequently you will sign medical releases at your physician’s office allowing them to communicate with any specialists you are seeing, like a podiatrist or a cardiologist. Protecting your medical privacy is very important but the law can create some complications.

Madelyn executed a Health Care Proxy that names her daughter, Stella, to make medical decisions when/if she is unable to make them herself. Unfortunately, her Health Care Proxy doesn’t include a HIPAA provision due to poor planning. Madelyn develops dementia and Stella feels that the doctor may be overlooking an undiagnosed mental illness. This is in addition to Madelyn’s cardiac issues. Since Stella isn’t the “personal representative” under HIPAA regulations, she has had a lot of difficulty speaking with her mom’s doctors and accessing written medical information. She is frustrated because she can’t make the best health decisions for her.

Madelyn also executed a Durable Power of Attorney which also named Stella to make her financial decisions if she would be unable to make them in the future. But, again, the document did not name Stella as her HIPAA “personal representative.” Stella cannot access Madelyn’s medical information and cannot prove to Madelyn’s financial institutions that she is indeed incapacitated. As a result the Power of Attorney document is of little value and may force Stella to seek out a costly Conservatorship in probate court.

To make sure your chosen agent(s) do not get caught up in this conundrum, your Power of Attorney and Health Care Proxy documents should contain HIPAA clauses. It is also highly recommended, and has long been the practice of this office, to sign separate HIPAA release forms.

Lacking HIPAA provisions isn’t the only reason why Health Care Proxy and/or Power of Attorney documents fail. Did you know that recent Massachusetts laws directly affect the way these documents should be drafted to be fully complete? Also easy to overlook items like lacking specific powers, or not having the document executed properly, can leave your family in a tough situation where they have to go to court to get the power you intended to grant them in the first place.

If you are concerned that your Health Care Proxy and/or Power of Attorney documents are lacking, please contact Vickstrom Law to make sure they are complete and comply with the new laws.

Photo credit, cyOFdevelin and used under a Creative Commons license.

Inspiration from the Food Network

Still, I do love the challenge of a new, never-been-tried recipe. Usually it’s something that friends or family have recommended or I’ve

managed to catch a few minutes of on Food Network. Personally, I’m partial to Bobby Flay and Alton Brown, Rachael Ray‘s great when I don’t have a lot of time. Who’s your favorite? Let me know in the comments.

Estate Planning with an accent on Planning

What I love about creating a new dish is that it is an entire experience. First I have to go to the market to get a bunch of exotic ingredients that I usually don’t have around the house (have you been to the Wegman’s in Northboro yet? Fun!). Then, once back in the kitchen, comes the prep where — hopefully — I get to employ some of the many kitchen gadgets that have gathered a bit too much dust. Finally, the cooking, where, if I’ve followed the recipe correctly, it all comes together in one exciting and delicious meal that will make everyone forget the stresses of the day.

Now, I don’t often talk about myself or my home life on my blog because I want this space to be about you and the challenges you face planning for your future. However, as I see more and more television advertisements for do-it-yourself legal document websites like LegalZoom, I worry that people are taking terrible risks with their estate planning and won’t be adequately protected for the future.

Cookie cutter solutions fail to plan

The problem with DIY legal doc services is that they essentially only give you one half of a recipe. LegalZoom can give you a list of documents you need and then prompt you to fill them out. Easy! But, what do you do then? You have a bunch of “critical” documents that have no relation to each other because they were coughed out by machines that don’t know you. You’ve just been told to cut up carrots, onions, and celery, but with no instruction on how to cook them in a pot of water to make a soup stock. Yes, those are the individual parts of a soup stock, but, you want to be able bring them all together, and use that stock to make one great dish.

All your estate planning ingredients must work together

This is why the advice of a legal professional is so, so important when planning an estate or trust. You will get both sides of the recipe: the ingredient list AND the instructions on how to turn all of those documents into a comprehensive plan — focused on a singular goal — to ensure that you and your family’s financial and medical needs are always met. All of the documents-and the components of those documents-necessary like HIPAA releases, declarations of homestead, will and trust provisions, beneficiary designations, and irrevocable trusts, etc., won’t be of any value to you unless you prepare them all together into a cohesive plan. They’re all essential pieces of the estate planning recipe but LegalZoom and the like can’t mix them together properly without getting to know you.

Don’t get caught with half a recipe, a bunch of individual ingredients, and nowhere to put them. Contact Worcester-area estate-planning and elder law attorney Kristina Vickstrom to ensure that your estate plan is legally sound and fully-baked.

The late singer’s will leaves everything to her 19-year-old daughter, Bobbi Kristina, but Kristina can’t access her mother’s estimated $20 million fortune right away because it is in a trust.

According to news reports, Houston’s will sets up what is known as a “testamentary trust” for her daughter. A testamentary trust is a trust created by a will. The will names a trustee and specifies what property will be put in the trust. Such a trust has no power or effect until the will of the donor is probated (processed through the legal system). Although a testamentary trust does not avoid the need for probate and becomes a public document because it is a part of the will, it can be useful in accomplishing other estate planning goals, such as providing for a child or reducing estate taxes in certain circumstances.

The person creating the trust may want to prevent a beneficiary who is a child or young adult from inheriting a large amount of money before he or she can handle it. One option is to pay the beneficiary in stages when the beneficiary reaches a certain age or achieves a specific goal.

This is what Whitney Houston’s trust does.  It reportedly allows Houston’s daughter to receive a 10 percent payout when she turns 21, another one-sixth when she turns 25, and the remainder of the trust’s assets when she turns 30. In this type of trust, the trustee usually has the discretion to distribute trust funds to the child at any time prior to attaining these ages, if needed for education or other reasons.

Will Never Updated

Now to the surprising parts of Houston’s estate plan.  First, as Forbes magazine columnists note, Houston could have accomplished the same goals through a living trust, a type of revocable trust, which would have kept the provisions of the trust private because it would pass outside of probate. Second, Houston was relying on a will that was created in 1993, when she was married to Bobby Brown, and it apparently was never updated, even after she and Brown divorced in 2007.  The will names Brown as the suggested guardian for Bobbi Kristina.  Although Bobbi Kristina is no longer a minor, Brown could still gain control of Kristina through a Conservatorship, as was done in the case of Britney Spears.  Finally, the will provided that if Houston had no living children at the time of her death, her fortune would be split between Brown and several family members.

Perhaps all this is what Houston wanted, even after her divorce from Brown, but that should have been made clear in an updated will.  As it stands, it appears that Houston simply neglected to do something elder law attorneys urge all clients to do: update their estate plan after a divorce or other major life change.

Trusts — either testamentary or living — can be set up for many different purposes. To decide if a trust is right for you, consult an elder law attorney.

Contact Attorney Kristina Vickstrom for more information on trusts.

Photo credit: asterix611 / cc by-sa 2.0

As an estate planning  and guardianship attorney, I recommend that all parents in Worcester who have children under 18 make planning a priority.  No one wants to consider the idea that they will not be able to raise their kids, but the unforeseen does happen.  By putting a plan into place while you are young and healthy, you can help determine your children’s future, even if you aren’t able to play the role in it that you had hoped.

For example, if you were to die or become somehow incapacitated, who would you choose to care for your child or children?  In many cases, the surviving parent is the obvious choice.  But, considering the fact that the family will be going through a particularly difficult time and that the parental responsibilities will now fall to one person, it may be beneficial to go a step further.  To do this, more central Massachusetts families are choosing to create an estate plan that provides for more financial support of both the children and the spouse.  In doing so, that caregiver can be relieved of some of the burden of working and raising the children.

In cases where both parents are killed or where one parent is already absent from the child’s life, setting up a guardianship is a must.  This allows you to determine who in your “village” will be responsible for the continued upbringing of your children.  Your estate plan may offer financial support to this person as well as trusts that the children can access when they reach a certain age.  That said, it is acceptable to place a different person than you named as guardian in charge of financial responsibilities.  An estate planning attorney will walk through the options with you in order to find a solution that best fits your situation.

When it comes to finances, it is also a good idea to consider what kinds of restrictions you might want to place on your children’s access to inheritance.  Some parents make access contingent upon certain goals such as age, education, and behavior.  Simply allowing access to a trust when a child reaches 18 may not always be the best approach due to inexperience and pressure from others.

Again, an estate planning attorney is well versed in the options available to parents who wish to plan for their minor children.  Choosing someone in the Worcester area, like Vickstrom Law, ensures that your estate plan is valid, complete, and meets the criteria of the local courts. For more information, please contact Attorney Kristina Vickstrom.

Photo Credit:  limaoscarjuliet / cc by 2.0

Not necessarily. Even if you are single and/or have no children, a Worcester Wills and Estates lawyer like Attorney Kristina Vickstrom should still be in your plans. Why? Because estate planning is really about YOU.

While it is absolutely advisable for married people or those with children to work with an estate planning lawyer, it’s also just as important for single adults. After all, when a married person suffers a major illness, it’s usually pretty clear who will eventually take on their medical and financial responsibility. The water gets murkier for unmarried individuals.

If you were to suddenly become incapacitated, who would make your medical decisions for you? Possibly your parents would be called in to determine how your medical care should proceed. It might be your sibling. But what if you don’t get along with your brother? Even if your parent or sibling would be your first choice, that doesn’t mean that the courts would agree without having your wishes legally documented.

The person to make medical and financial decision on your behalf is whomever the courts decide! Again, it could be a parent, a sibling, some other relative, or even a court-appointed individual (a stranger!). While she was not single when she was hit with dementia, the children of the late signer, Etta James, fought repeatedly with their step-father over the management of her assets and health care. James should have documented her wishes and avoided a lot of the conflict, allowing her family to more fully enjoy her last moments.

Finally, who would have legal rights to your belongings, to your home, to your pets? You may think you know the answers, but without clearly outlining your wishes with a Worcester area Wills and Trusts attorney, you have very little control over the matter. Families can be torn apart by court battles involving an estate with no Will. Popular Swedish novelist Stieg Larsson, who died unexpectedly in 2004, had been living with his girlfriend of 30 years at his passing and had taken on no estate planning. A legal battlefield erupted over his assets, namely the rights to his successful publications. With the exception of an unfinished manuscript on a shared laptop, his girlfriend walked away with nothing and Larsson’s father and brother inherited everything. This also could have been avoided, or lessened, if Larsson had set up even the most basic of estate plans.

A single adult without children does not need to worry about creating guardianships and trusts to provide for his or her children, but it’s certainly a good idea to look out for yourself. Some of the basic legal documents any single person should have include:

• A Will to determine what will become of your assets in the event of your death.
• A Health Care Proxy to name the person you want making medical decisions on your behalf.
• A Power of Attorney for financial matters to name the person you feel should be responsible for your money if you are incapacitated.
• And possibly a revocable living trust to centralize management of assets if you become incapacitated and keep your assets out of probate if you should pass away.

These documents are crucial in ensuring that your wishes are met and that you have control over your future. One doesn’t need to a famous R&B singer or best-selling, author to need an estate plan. Everyone, including single people, in Worcester County, should consider estate planning.  Contact Vickstrom Law today to set up a consultation or to find out more information.

Photo courtesy of Bree Bailey

It’s estimated that nearly 65% of Americans don’t have a Will. Fred is a healthy, vibrant sixty-five year old man. He exercises three times and week, and has made a conscious effort to eat well since his recent diagnosis of diabetes. After speaking with many close friends, Lenore, Fred’s wife, insists that they both create Wills. Fred insists that he is perfectly healthy, wishing to leave the issue of estate planning until he experiences further health problems. What if Fred was to die without a Will?

If Fred dies in 2012, or later, without creating a Will or using some legal method to transfer his assets, Massachusetts law, specifically, the rules of intestacy, determine what happen to your property. After payment of debts, expenses, administration and funeral costs, your property will be distributed to your heirs according to a predetermined legal formula. The problem is that the formula that the Commonwealth uses may not end up being how you would like your estate divided. If no relatives can found to inherit your assets, they are taken by the State.

Intestacy distribution, under the MUPC, specifies that if Fred dies leaving a spouse with no children and his parents are also deceased, his spouse receives everything. But, the same scenario if Fred’s father is still alive at his passing, Fred’s wife and father will each inherit from Fred’s estate.

What if Fred passed with a spouse and minor children? Then his spouse would inherit everything, regardless of whether his parents were still living. However, if one of his children was from a previous relationship, the current spouse and ALL of Fred’s children are heirs together and inherit a portion of his estate.

Despite the changes under the MUPC, Massachusetts Wills still have a spousal elective share clause, which means you can’t disinherit your spouse in your Will. In most cases the surviving spouse can elect to get the first $100,000 or $200,000 of the estate, plus a portion of the remaining property, instead of what their spouse left in their Will.

The rules of intestacy may appear confusing and difficult to apply given your unique situation. It is always best to determine how you would like your assets to pass through a properly executed Last Will & Testament, or even a Trust. In this way, you can ensure that family members you are not close with do not end up inheriting through your estate. You may also provide for step-children in the case of blended families.

The best way to truly ensure that your family is protected and that your estate is distributed the way you want it is to consult with a knowledgeable attorney’s office, like Vickstrom Law, who specializes in Estate Planning.

John and Laura had estate plans created shortly after their marriage in 2002. After learning of Laura’s infidelity, John undertook divorce proceedings but failed to update his estate plan to remove Laura. For the past five years John has had a serious girlfriend. Last week John was diagnosed with prostate cancer and wants to ensure his girlfriend gets his estate in the event of his death. Laura has an adult special needs son, Bill, and John would like some of the assets to go to Bill for his care. He feels that his family is aware of such intentions and that hiring an attorney is an unnecessary cost. Is John right?

A change in your marital status should be followed by a change in your estate plan. It is important to note that in Massachusetts, marriage voids a will executed prior to the marriage, unless the will appears as though it was made in contemplation of marriage. Divorce may also necessitate modifying an existing estate plan to disinherit an ex-spouse. Contrary to conventional wisdom, just because you’re divorced does not automatically remove your ex-spouse as a beneficiary of an account such as an IRA. Consider the revision or replacement of your estate plan as a part of the divorce process, which will look at all the pieces of your estate to make sure you are not overlooking something.

If your named executors, beneficiaries under your will/trust, or other beneficiaries are no longer in your life, you definitely want to update your documents to reflect a new beneficiary or executor. You may also want to include a new child, grandchild, niece or nephew who has been born after your last will was signed. John should make sure that his ex-wife is removed from all of his assets.

If a beneficiary becomes disabled, or has special needs, you may wish to update your estate plan to accommodate the increased needs of that individual by creating a Special Needs Trust (SNT). A SNT will allow assets to be protected for the disabled beneficiary without disqualifying him or her from receiving government benefits when you pass. A SNT within John’s estate plan would ensure that any funds left to Bill did not effect his benefits.

You might not be aware of all of the changes in estate-planning law, but new cases or statutes might have an impact on the structure of your individual estate plan. Have your attorney revisit your estate plan every few years to ensure its compliance with the current law. For example, John doesn’t know that the Power of Attorney statute changed in Massachusetts recently. He should ensure that his document complies with the new law.

Documents that need to be included in an estate plan and the manner of signature may vary on a state-by-state basis. Some states require more written witnesses and others do not recognize hand-written wills. Upon relocation to another state, review your estate-planning documents to ensure their validity in your new state. This is another example of why you should not look to make your estate plan yourself or use pre-printed forms. John’s original Will was drafted in Rhode Island. He’ll need a Massachusetts document now that he lives here and is looking to make changes anyway since his divorce.

Your estate plan is not something that should be executed once and placed in a safety deposit box. Make sure that you review it at least every few years and whenever your life changes OR the life of your beneficiary changes. If your life has changed significantly since you last did your estate planning, or it’s been more than five years since you executed your documents, be sure to consult with a qualified estate planning attorney, like Attorney Kristina Vickstrom, that can perform an estate plan review to let you know your plan is all set for a few more years or recommend any proper updates and changes.

Mary lived alone on a large estate for fifteen years following her wealthy second husband’s death. Her only living relative was her sister, Louise. The two have been close since childhood, but in recent times the frailty of both women has led to fewer and fewer visits. Mary passed away in January after a three-year battle with endometrial cancer. Although weakened by age and sickness, often delusional and dependent on prescription medication, Mary executed a second version of her will in 2010 (unbeknownst to Louise) with the assistance of her live-in caregiver, Kate. When the terms of Mary’s will are administered, Louise discovers that she is to receive just $1,000 while Kate is the primary benefactor of Mary’s $450,000 estate.

Many times, the relative of one who has recently passed believes that they were unjustly left out of a will. Perhaps due to the mental state of the deceased, the relative might believe that the deceased was delusional in granting a non-relative a financial windfall. In the above example, Louise would like to know whether she has any legal recourse to challenge Kate’s award. She feels that Kate knew about Mary’s delusional capabilities and possibly took advantage of Mary in receiving the majority of Mary’s estate, and finds it hard to believe that her sister would not have left her more. However, it is also reasonable to see that Mary might have felt indebted to Kate and wanted to provide her with a genuine token of appreciation for her services.

In order to create a valid will in Massachusetts a person must possess “testamentary capacity”. In most states, this means that the person creating the will understands the nature of the document, the worth of her assets, and her relationship with whomever she is transferring them to. Testamentary capacity requires freedom from delusion which is the effect of disease or weakness and which might influence the disposition of her property. The person executing the will needs only to be aware of her actions during the period of time she is making the will. The fact that he or she doesn’t remember it the day after does not invalidate a will.

Although wills contests arise frequently, proving that a person is without testamentary capacity is difficult because signing a will does not require a great deal of coherence nor consistency. Louise would have be allowed to contest Mary’s will in the probate court, but it likely would lead to a lot of costly litigation. Most often the disagreeing parties will negotiate a settlement to mitigate the litigation.

If a relative finds themselves in a similar position, they should contact an attorney experienced in Estate Administration to discuss the possibility of a legal claim. If you considering disinheriting an heir who might attempt to challenge a will’s provisions, speak to an experienced Estate Planning attorney about avoiding the probate process altogether through the use revocable or irrevocable trust planning.

Contesting a will is a procedural and difficult process. Yet, if you feel that a loved one lacked the mental capacity to transfer his or her estate, contact our office to discuss your options.

The Massachusetts legislature has finally recognized the strong bond that exists between man and animal by passing legislation that allows a pet owner to establish a trust fund to provide ongoing care for any animals alive during their lifetime. The Act states simply that “[a] trust for the care of one or more animals . . . is valid.” Prior to this legislation being enacted, an animal owner had to leave funds with a human caretaker, who would then agree to provide care to any animals.

The statute provides that the trust will not terminate until the benefited animal, or the last of several animals, has passed away. This assumes that the trust contains enough funds to continue to exist for that length of time. Thus, it is not enough to merely create a trust. You must also ensure that enough assets will be placed into the trust to provide the desired care. Some people overcome the lack of present funds by purchasing a life insurance policy that will pay into the trust when they pass away. Conversely, if the trust receives an excessive amount of assets, the statute also allows for a reduction of the funds, so long as there will be no substantial impact on the animal.

When creating a pet trust, it is necessary to name a trustee, who will be responsible for managing and investing the funds, as well as making distributions for animal care. Fortunately, failure to name a trustee will not be fatal as the statute provides that the court shall name the trustee in this case. The legislation also provides safeguards by restricting distributions to the trustee, with the exception of trustee fees, costs of administration and any other distribution authorized by the trust. Further, the statute allows for court enforcement of the trust if the trust funds are being misused.

When the last of the animals passes away, or if there is a reduction as indicated above, the funds would first be distributed as directed in the trust. If there is an absence of direction, the funds would be returned to the person who created the trust, if they are still alive. If they are not alive, then the funds would pass pursuant to the residuary clause of their Will. In the absence of a Will, the funds would pass in accordance with the laws of intestacy, which distribute your assets if you pass away without a Will. The best trust would provide for distribution of the balance within its terms.

Another important decision when planning for your pet is determining who will serve as your pet’s caretaker. While the statute does not restrict the trustee from acting as the caretaker, this arrangement is not recommended as it could lead to a lack of oversight with respect to animal care, trust fund management, or both. It is also recommended that you name at least one alternate caretaker, if not several, who would provide care if the originally named caretaker was unable to do so.

To ensure that the plan is carried out as intended, you should also address the following concerns. Remember that your pet will pass through your estate as personal property; therefore, you must leave your pet to the trust in your Will or by assignment prior to your passing. In addition, your plan should clearly describe the animal to avoid “replacement” of the animal by an unscrupulous caregiver who desires to continue receiving payments from the trust. If your animal has specific care requirements, you should be sure to clearly describe those requirements and to specifically authorize any expenditures that might be considered unusual or excessive. Finally, you should be sure to include strict guidelines for euthanasia and to address the final disposition of your animal.

Planning for the ongoing care of your animals has never been easier. If you have a current plan in place for the care of your animals, you should update your plan to take advantage of this new law. If you do not have a plan in place for the care of your animals, there is no time like the present to establish one.

One of the most prominent sellers of do-it-yourself wills and other estate planning documents, is the target of a class action lawsuit in California charging that the company engages in deceptive business practices and is practicing law without a license.

The lawsuit was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on May 27, 2010, by Katherine Webster, who is the niece of the late Anthony J. Ferrantino and the executor of Mr. Ferrantino’s estate.

Knowing that he had only a few months to live, Mr. Ferrantino asked Ms. Webster in July 2007 to help him use LegalZoom to execute a will and living trust. Based on LegalZoom’s advertising, Ms. Webster says she believed that the documents they created would be legally binding and that if they encountered any problems, the company’s customer service department would resolve them.

But after the living trust documents were created and signed, Ms. Webster could not transfer any of her uncle’s assets into the trust because the financial institutions that held his money refused to accept the LegalZoom documents as valid. Ms. Webster tried to get help from LegalZoom, with no success. The trust was still not funded when Mr. Ferrantino died in November 2007.

Ms. Webster was forced to hire an estate planning attorney, who petitioned the court to allow the post-death funding of the trust. The attorney then had to convince the banks to transfer the funds — a more difficult task following Mr. Ferrantino’s death. The attorney also discovered that the will LegalZoom created for Mr. Ferrantino had not been properly witnessed. All this cost Mr. Ferrantino’s estate thousands of dollars.

The lawsuit claims that Ms. Webster and others like her relied on misleading statements by LegalZoom, including that LegalZoom carefully reviews customer documents, that it guarantees its customers 100 percent satisfaction with its services, that its documents are the same quality as those prepared by an attorney, and that the documents are effective and dependable.

“Nowhere in the [company's] manual do defendants explain that using LegalZoom is not the same as using an attorney and that its documents are only ‘customized’ to the extent that the LegalZoom computer program inputs your name and identifying information, but not tailored to your specific circumstances,” the lawsuit states, adding that “the customer service representatives are not lawyers and cannot by law provide legal advice.”

Ms. Webster is suing not only on her behalf but on behalf of anyone in California who paid LegalZoom for a living trust, will, living will, advance health care directive or power of attorney. The lawsuit estimates this class embraces more than 3,000 individuals.

“LegalZoom’s business is based on nurturing the false sense of security that people do not need to hire a traditional attorney,” says San Francisco attorney Robert Arns, one of the attorneys who filed the lawsuit. “The complaint points out that LegalZoom advertises that you don’t need a real attorney because its work is legally binding and reliable. That’s misleading. Improperly prepared estate planning documents are a ticking time bomb that can result in improper tax consequences and other items that could cost the estate and heirs huge sums.”

“LegalZoom preys on people when they’re at their most vulnerable, when they are of advanced age or poor health and need a will or a living trust,” adds San Francisco elder abuse attorney Kathryn Stebner, Ms. Webster’s lead counsel.

One of the defendants named in the suit is LegalZoom co-founder Robert Shapiro, who appears on the LegalZoom Web page and TV ads and who is best-known for being one of O.J. Simpsons attorneys.

This is not the first suit against LegalZoom. In December 2009, a Missouri man who paid LegalZoom to prepare his will sued the company for engaging in the unauthorized practice of law (Janson v. LegalZoom). The lawsuit is also seeking class action status. LegalZoom is trying to have the case removed from Missouri state court to the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri.

For a copy of Ms. Webster’s complaint, click here.

If you have an estate plan that was prepared by an online preparation service you may want to have it reviewed by an estate planning attorney that is licensed in your state to ensure that it is complete and actually accomplishing your planning goals.